Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 16 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
Testimony: Agents spurred judge to act
Phillips deposited $516K, moved money day after investigators appeared in office
Published Wednesday, October 29, 2008
The day after special agents with the Alabama Attorney General’s office subpoenaed probate documents in the estate of Cary Douglas Piper, then-Probate Judge Sherrie Phillips was at the front door of a local investment firm when it opened, deposited $516,000, moved the monies from an individual account to a public trust account and made a mid-morning appointment with the same special agents, according to testimony presented Tuesday.
Jurors in the felony ethics and theft case of more than $1.8 million heard from a parade of 14 witnesses for the prosecution Tuesday, including the administrator of the approximately $3 million estate, investment representatives, bankers and an agent who investigated the case.
The administrator, Mary Drew Sullivan, said she and her attorney, John Brock of Evergreen, met on several occasions with Phillips, both for lunch and in her office. Sullivan testified Tuesday that she brought the estate to Covington County to settle at the advice of her attorney, who carpooled to law school with Phillips. She said she opened a bank account for the estate in Andalusia so that Phillips could have jurisdiction over the case.
Sullivan, who spent about an hour on the stand, said that on Jan. 4, 2008, she authorized five official checks from Piper’s estate, including:
• Checks for herself and for her attorney, Brock, each of who was awarded 15 percent fees for administration and legal work on the account. The fees were approximately $450,000 for each.
• A check for $148,000 to the IRS.
• A check for $3,650 to Covington County Probate Court.
• A check for $1.8 million payable to Sherrie Phillips.
Sullivan said at the time the checks were written, she believed the $3,650 was going to the probate court for fees associated with the estate, and the $1.8 million would be escheated to the state. Escheat is the process of turning unclaimed property from an estate over to the state in case heirs appear.
At the time, Sullivan testified, she did not believe Piper had any heirs; since that time, a claim against the estate has been filed on behalf of six first cousins.
Financial adviser Bill Greenwald testified that on Jan. 4, 2008, Phillips opened a new account with his firm, Edward Jones, with the $1.8 million check. Submitted into evidence was the new account form, which includes Phillips’ home address, Social Security number and signature.
Greenwald testified that any time someone opens an account, he has to ask about the account’s purpose.
He said that, to the best of his recollection, Phillips mentioned she was going to use part of it and wanted the rest to supplement her retirement. Consequently, he said, he opened a money market account and ordered her some checks.
He testified that when he asked Phillips where the money came from, she said from the settlement of an estate.
Greenwald said that while this account was established as a personal account, he previously had dealt with Philips in managing public fund accounts, in which she invested money for conservatorships, guardian or trust accounts. In the other accounts, he said, she used the federal tax identification number of the probate judge’s office.
With Greenwald on the stand, assistant attorney general William Lisenby, who heads the office’s public corruption and white collar crime division, took jurors through copies of 10 checks totaling $516,917. The checks also were corroborated by other witnesses. The checks included:
• $25,000 to Alan and Donna Phillips, her son and daughter-in-law;
• $100,545 to First Farm South Credit. The check was used to pay off three loans, according to testimony by Russell Walters of that institution;
• $74,454.32 to herself; Jurors heard testimony that this check was deposited into her personal checking account on the day after she purchased a new Cadillac Escalade from J.M. Jackson in Opp. Witnesses also heard from Johnny Jackson, who described meeting with Phillips in her office at the courthouse when she described the features and the color vehicle she wanted. A bill of sale admitted into evidence showed that the vehicle cost $60,166. Also admitted was a photograph of the vehicle parked near the courthouse with a personalized car tag that read “23JUDGE.”
• $25,000 to Buddy Phillips, her husband;
• $35,843.80 to Regions Bank. The check was used to pay off a loan to Erik Bryan of Opp, according to testimony from Nancy Cole;
• $6,597 to D&S Fence. Phillips hired D&S to replace porch railings and columns at her house, according to testimony from the company’s owner, Delmar Wiggins;
• $25,822.61 to Superior Bank; Jay Kelly of that institution testified that the check was to pay off a loan to Donna R. Spiers, Tim Reid and Sherrie R. Phillips for a home located at 217 Anderson St. in Kinston;
• $100,000 to Tim Reid, her brother;
• $100,000 to Sherrie Phillips;
• $23,654 to Andalusia Ford; Jurors heard testimony from Hunter Owen of Andalusia Ford that the check was used to purchase a F350 truck.
Probate office employees Karen Lawson and Jackie Watt both testified that agents with the attorney general’s office appeared in the probate office on April 30, 2008, with a subpoena for all documents in the Piper estate.
Lawson said she called Phillips’ cell phone, told her about the subpoena, and read her the contents of the file before Phillips instructed her to provide the information to the investigators. Arrangements were made for Phillips to meet with the investigators at 10:30 a.m. on the following day, May 1, 2008.
Greenwald’s administrative assistant Nichole Adkison testified that on May 1, 2008, Phillips was at the office when she opened the doors at 8:30 a.m.
“She was coming in to make a deposit,” Adkison said.
Adkison said Phillips questioned her about how the account was listed, then said she needed to get it “corrected.”
Adkison said that she is not authorized to open new accounts, but assisted Phillips in working with the firm’s home office in St. Louis to transfer funds from her personal account to a public funds account using the tax identification number of the probate office. She deposited $516,000 that day, Adkison said. The deposit included checks for $49,000 and $23,000 from her brothers; $12,000 from her husband; and a $32,000 check from her personal account.
“She said she had auditors coming that day and she wanted to make sure everything was right,” Adkison testified.
Special agent Chris McRae of the attorney general’s office testified that when he and another agent met with Phillips later that morning, she provided them with an account statement from Edward Jones, including her own handwritten notes showing the $516,000 deposit she had made that day, and told them the account had been listed in her name and with her personal Social Security number by mistake. She also told the investigators that she had planned to hold the money in the Edward Jones account until she turned it over to the state as unclaimed property to see if heirs appeared. The judge acknowledged that after 90 days she was supposed to send the funds to the state, McRae testified.
McRae said Phillips also told the investigators that neither she nor any member of her family had benefited from the money.
McRae said he met with Phillips again on May 2, 2008, and she presented him with a copy of the official check for $1.8 million.
“She told me after the interview on May 1 she had located it in a safe under her desk,” McRae said.
On cross examination of both Greenwald and McRae, defense attorney Riley Powell established that deposits totaling the amounts of the checks written from the Edward Jones account had been repaid to the account.
Powell pushed McRae to state who the rightful owner of the $1.8 million was after the check was written.
“All I can tell you is that Judge Phillips did not own it,” McRae said.
Other testimony included:
• Watt, the probate secretary, testified that she had worked as a secretary in the probate office since 1992 and typically assigned case numbers and set up files for actions that came before the judge. This case was different, she said, in that she did not set up a file. Instead, she said, the file is in Phillips’ handwriting. She only became aware of the case, she said, after the investigation began.
She also testified that she typically records monies received in probate cases, but did not have any documentation of the $1.8 million or $3,650.
• Cynthia Powell, who manages operations in the probate office related to vehicles, testified that Phillips asked her to cash the $3,650 check so that she could pay the probate fees and “give the difference to the lady.”
Presented as evidence was the deposit recap on which it was noted that $3,640 in cash was given to Phillips and the check was deposited.

Comments
Posted by andervic (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 7:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
so lets see she took the money put it into a personal account and when agents showed up she returned it all, hmm. being a conservator myself if i would have done that i would be in jail.
Posted by patwilliam (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ain't that the truth. Seems maybe she knew what she had done was wrong and she thought by righting that wrong that she would be okay. Yeah, she was running scared, but thankfully the investigators saw through it. That's why shes on trial now.
Posted by andervic (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 8:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
if you remember when the guy was viewing the chads after the bush-gore election well that is how the guardian ad litem views them so hopefully the investigators don the same with her. i have had to reimburse receipts because they had faded and was not readible
Posted by patwilliam (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
She surely was trying to cover all her bases. And the women who have testified against her who are employees of the probate office better watch out if she gets off, cause they will be looking for another job, just as the other lady did that took the garnishment for her. Boy oh boy. She will probably have a move on Lifetime with this one. Kinda reminds me of one of them. I know this isn't funny, but it's just the mental image that comes to mind of Sherrie scurrying around trying to get all her ducks in a row BEFORE the investigators got her good!
"Her family didn't benefit from the money".....uhmmm...who are they trying to fool. They surely took the checks she gave them, paid off loans, I'm sure they were planning a big ole "family vacation" to the bahamas or something, but it all got interrupted. Oops.
To the heirs of this estate, I hope yall get justice for her actions and I hope yall get every red cent you are entitled to!
Posted by alhm (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Was she not making enought as it was? Someone elect me next so I can "borrow" some money to pay off my debts and give the rest of my family some fun money.
Posted by kathy (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 9:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey BamaDude you are so right. But you know since I made a comment on here about my working for a lawyer that she purchase jewlery from. I wonder why my post aren't coming threw someone want to email me and tell me what I am doing wrong?kathy@oppcatv.com Cause I sure would like to know why my post don't show up??????????
Posted by patwilliam (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 10:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Don't have a clue Kathy....but keep trying. Yes BamaDude, the Jury will decide, and I surely hope they are open minded individuals who will see the truth in front of their eyes and not be clouded by the fact that "she was an elected official", elected by the people. Not everyone voted for her, and yes, she's been in office for several years, but she hasn't had any real competition either. She worked for Judge Enzor for years prior to her appointment, and so there you have it. As far as trusting her, that's a bit far stretched. A lot of folks have never trusted her, they just didn't have a whole lot of choices. The probate office handles a lot more than what folks know. I truly and anxiously await the outcome of this trial, just wish I had a front row seat! I'm very anxious to know if she will testify in her own behalf????
Posted by Blondie (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for removing my post!
Posted by andervic (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
for bamadude 85% of us, perhaps more, don't believe we'll ever have to stand before a judge in Court and defend ourselves. We try to lead good lives, help our family and fellow human beings when we can, and follow the law. Some stray, yes, perhaps even stray beyond the degree of petty crimes. But, most of us don't.
We have been told all our lives that only a select group of people are capable of being judges. Judges, you see, are the cream of the crop, they're more intelligent than we, have greater sense of judgment, and they are held to a higher standard.
We were told wrong.
Many judges, most judges, are made of enormous egos that are fed by the power wielded when they bang their gavels or when they enter the courtroom and we all have to stand and greet them as if they are royalty. We sit meekly in the courtroom and obey their every command, afraid to say anything, even to stick up for ourselves for fear that the judge might get mad.
Judges play the law like a good game of poker. In reality, a judge doesn't even have to follow the law because the only way to remedy an improper judgment or action of the judge is to appeal the hearing. Appeals cost thousands of dollars depending of the complexity of the case with $10,000 pretty much the bottom line cost for an appeal. Judges know few of us can afford to appeal.
The appellate courts give considerable leeway to the lower Court's discretion. If a judge simply give you an incorrect verdict, you're sunk because appeals aren't about what's right and what's wrong, they're about legal errors made throughout the hearing. Judges are well trained to make few operational mistakes and they've got plenty of experience making the record of the hearing "support" their verdict by choosing their words precisely and making statements on the record to cover up anything they think might cause an appeal.
Judges stick together just like lawyers stick together. You and I are alone.
Posted by andervic (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 7:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
bamadude GUILTY imagine that. those that have delt with her know her and her irraticic actions like making someone pay for there food when they visit a sister. I HAVE A PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE WITH HER AND HER CRONIE.
Posted by ElaineRenoire (anonymous) on October 29, 2008 at 8:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Visit NASGA, www.StopGuardianAbuse.org and read victims' stories. Our members have stood helpless before uncaring, incompetent, or corrupt judges as we pleaded for the well-being of our loved ones who were being exploited by their court-appointed "protectors" in unlawful and abusive guardianship proceedings.
We have presented evidence of financial exploitation and churning by greedy guardians and their attorneys, only to be silenced by the loud thud of judges' rubber stamps.
We have been rendered helpless to protect our loved ones as they were forced into nursing homes against their will and isolated from us.
We know too well that accountability is rare in the (in)justice system.
Any judge found to be engaging in criminal acts must be disbarred from the bench, charged with a crime, and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.
The public trust must be restored and the only chance of doing that is accountability.
www.StopGuardianAbuse.org
Posted by kathy (anonymous) on October 30, 2008 at 6:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank You Pat for helping me. I am kinda of crazy hear lately. But I think I heard she would be sentenced November 12th. That will tell the tell.
Posted by hdsd (anonymous) on October 30, 2008 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
One ,thing to add on here, is that the Governor is about to appoint another Judge in her position. Lee is there now, But I understand he is looking at appointing GREG WHITE,come on now, let him the Governor know , that we don't need him there. It is going to happen unless we come together within the community and push for him to either hold special election, or someone other than WHITE,LOL, he has done enough damage to our county as it is. CALL THE GOVERNOR NOW ,DON'T WAIT,
Posted by Blondie (anonymous) on October 30, 2008 at 11:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just because Greg White served as Country Comm. that this makes him qualified for Probate Judge? Are there not any other qualified people out there to fill this position?
Posted by Ineedtobeheard (anonymous) on November 7, 2008 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I hope they appoint one soon.....Lee has other duties to attend to.
Posted by fancy2167 (anonymous) on November 9, 2008 at 2:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
She probably will get a slap on the wrist and still have her job, just like james and james they are still practicing law. What is wrong with that picture?
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)