Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 7 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

Why keep proposed rules secret?

Published Tuesday, May 12, 2009

“The press and public are entitled to the documents and agendas made available to members of public boards at the time they are made available to the board members.”

Alabama Opinion of Attorney General 2000-252 (Sept. 29, 2000)

Call us cynical if you will, but we are immediately suspicious when governing bodies seek to withhold information from both the media and the public.

The Covington County Commission’s refusal this week to disclose its proposed rules for bingo brings this immediately to mind.

Constitutional Amendment 565 – approved by statewide vote in 1994 – authorizes charitable bingo in Covington County and authorizes the commission to “promulgate rules and regulations for issuing permits or licenses and for operating bingo games within the county.”

In the 15 years since it passed, the county hasn’t addressed the issue, but has instead relied upon rules passed by the legislature in 1993. That enabling legislation authorizes the sheriff to issue $100 permits for bingo.

Bingo has changed in those 15 years and now represents big profits through electronic gaming. With more than one company expressing an interest in placing electronic machines in Covington County, the financially strapped commission is interested in getting a share of those profits.

Earlier this year, they unanimously asked that the 1993 laws be repealed. A local bill was introduced in the current session of the legislature, but has not come out of committee.

Last week in this space, we urged the commission to set rules governing bingo rather than “washing its hands of it” as a frustrated Chairman Lynn Sasser had promised. We have not changed our position.

We were pleased that the matter was on the agenda for Monday’s commission meeting. Indeed, we have learned, that the commissioners last Friday received a 13 to 15-page document setting out proposed rules. But the matter was removed from the agenda on Monday to give commissioners more time to review those proposed rules.

The county’s attorney stated that “The purpose of them is to give the commission more power to regulate bingo. It’s not gambling. It’s bingo set out in the constitutional amendment 565, which specifically states the commission has the authority to implement rules and regulations.”

A Star-News staff member has twice asked for a copy of the proposed rules. We were told that the proposed rules weren’t public record because they had not yet been acted upon and fell under attorney-client confidentiality. The Covington Baptist Association was given the same response.

In essence, the county is saying “you’ll know what the rules are when we pass them.” As a result, the county’s citizens are being excluded from the deliberative process. Alabama’s Open Meetings laws and its Open Records laws, which date back to 1915, are specifically designed to include citizens in that process.

The legislature does not pass laws that haven’t seen the light of day. In fact their proposals are published and reviewed before committees that provide opportunity for public input.

The Alabama attorney general’s opinion written in 2000 and printed above states that the press and the public are entitled to documents when they are received by public boards.

Why wouldn’t the county commissioners want the light of day shining on their proposals? Why wouldn’t they want input from the voters they serve?

It makes us wonder what they’re trying to hide.

Editorials reflect the opinion of The Andalusia Star-News.




Comments

Posted by townconstable (anonymous) on May 12, 2009 at 11:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The county attorney has a history of making up rules out of thin air to suit her purposes or those of elected officials and county employees. She demonstrated this talent in covering up the malfeasance of the previous sheriff after the jail breaks. The proposed rules clearly fall under the definition of "public writing" in Alabama's Open Records Law. When the landed in the County Commission office they automatically became a public records. The fact that they have not been adopted is quite beside the point. Also, the fact that the "proposed rules" were removed from the agenda does not put them in some special class or put them beyond public inspection. The Baptist Association or the Star News should think about a asking a lawyer with a greater legal acumen than the county's mouthpiece.

Posted by ToldYouSo (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 8:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Townconstable: Now that's the way you get things done. And while this info is being asked for (demanded)...what about finding out just what the Queen is being paid to make ALL decisions for this county? I believe her total salary would be just as much "public record" as any other documents.
This latest development is just further proof of the total lack of understanding which the Commission has concerning their governoring authority and responsibility. Really embarrassing.

Posted by townconstable (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 11:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You could ask to see all the canceled payroll checks for the last pay period and you would have the answer. Such checks are public writings.

Posted by outlaw11 (anonymous) on May 14, 2009 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Someone who signs in as 'covingtoncountycitizen2008' wrote in another comment section that he/she knew the salary in question. We need to ask them to provide it in one of these sections, so, maybe some of the questions can be answered or at least set a basis for an inquiry.

Posted by LoyalAmerican (anonymous) on May 15, 2009 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Once again, as stated in a previous post, I believe....strongly, Alabama Attorney General King needs to become involved and authorize an investigation into the inner workings of Covington County Commissioners and all administrative personnel.

Posted by LoyalAmerican (anonymous) on May 15, 2009 at 3:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

outlaw11: Curiously, those posts referring to this subject matter are no longer on line! The voter masses need to congregate, with legal counsel, at the next Commissioners meeting!! It is time to clip some wings!

Posted by outlaw11 (anonymous) on May 15, 2009 at 7:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree...I know that some of these posts are actually the very one we are reffering to and they know that when they are busted, the real tale will be told. So, yes, any and all reading this need to stop all postings and just show up at the next meeting, stand up, voice your opinion, ask your questions, demand an answer...then, and only then, will you get an answer or a reason to report it to the Atty Gen's office...we need a moritorium or at least an overwhelming total to gain a general concensus to report the "alleged wrong-doings" to the Atty Gen's office. LoyalAmerican is right on line...all concerned, please reply.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

© 2009 The Andalusia Star News All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us