Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 11 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

Tax vote on agenda

Schools will ask county for money

Published Saturday, February 6, 2010

The Andalusia Board of Education will ask the Covington County Commission to implement a 3 mill tax Monday, a move the city superintendent said will save jobs and programs.

By law, county commissioners are required to determine property tax rates at their first meeting in February. City BOE members hope this year the commission will include 3 mills they believe should have been imposed following the passage of Amendment 2 in 2006.

At its Jan. 26 meeting, school board members received an opinion from Mark Christensen, who is the city attorney. He and Mayor Earl Johnson previously had agreed to work with the board in an effort to resolve a question over local funding.

In the opinion, Christensen said he agreed with the board’s position that the 2006 constitutional amendment requiring a minimum of 10 mills of unrestricted local funding should have netted an additional 3 mills for the local system. Christensen’s letter stated it was vital the board make its request for the additional 3 mills immediately since by law, the commission must compute and determine the millage collection rates for each school district within the county at Monday’s meeting.

ACS Superintendent Beverly McAnulty said the additional three mills would mean approximately $300,000 annually for the city schools.

Because the tax hasn’t been implemented, the system has lost at least four years of the additional revenue, or $1.2 million by the end of the current budget year.

With current economic times and the state cutting back, McAnulty said the city schools will definitely see some cuts in staffing and programs in the 2012 budget year and the extra 3 mills could help the system.

However, she would not comment on what the cuts would be.

“We are not going to be able to budget the money, but we will certainly be able to use the money,” she said.

“It will certainly help us address things that come up.”

McAnulty said that since this money would not be earmarked, it could be used for operational expenses.

“We can use it for whatever there is a need,” she said.

If the commission approves the additional three mills, homeowners would see a $3 increase per $1,000 of assessed property value.

Property taxes are assessed at 10 percent of appraised property values. For example, a home that is appraised at $50,000 would be assessed at $5,000.

Under the current millage rate, the homeowner would pay $195 in property taxes each year, but with the additional 3 mills it would cost the homeowner $15 more, or $210.

Businesses and rental properties are assessed at 20 percent of appraised property values.

So business property that appraised at $50,000 would be assessed at $10,000. An 3 mill increase would mean $30 more per year.

In his opinion, Christensen told board members they should seek a declaratory judgment in court if the 3 mills aren’t assessed this year.

McAnulty said that’s a decision the board will have to make if the commission fails to increase the ad valorem tax within the city.

“This is not anything personal against the commissioners, but we feel we are due the 3 mills,” McAnulty said.

“When this was first voted on, we were one of the 30 schools that were on the list initially. We have been working on this for two and a half years. It’s really not against the commission per say; it’s trying to resolve the issue.”

McAnulty said the problem lies with the information provided to commissioners by the state departments of education and revenue.

When campaign literature was compiled in support of the amendment in 2006, Andalusia was listed among the “underfunded” systems which would benefit from the amendment’s passage.

However, after the amendment passed, Andalusia was not included among the systems the departments listed to receive an increase.




Comments

Posted by starfish (anonymous) on February 6, 2010 at 6:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

“We can use it for whatever there is a need,” she said.
Beverly McAnulty

Uh-huh, sounds like a plan to me.

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 6, 2010 at 10:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe they could spend some of this new funding on a night security guard. I figure they can afford fifteen grand to have someone walk the grounds.

Posted by winkie (anonymous) on February 7, 2010 at 8:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

NO NEW TAX !!!!

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 7, 2010 at 1:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This isn't a new tax. It's one the voters put in place in an election in 2006 and was to be in place by 2008. The county just never started collecting it.

I'm sure most of the money not budgeted will be used for utilities. Gas and electricity are going be rough on the pocket book here when inflation starts up at the end of the year.

Posted by nwcorner (anonymous) on February 7, 2010 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

that is right winkie "no new tax" get the money from the bingo halls and casinos and leave us "the public alone" We would like to see the receipts of how you are spending "Our Money"!
Security Guards are a liability, use motion sensors and cameras

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 7, 2010 at 9:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Motion sensors and cameras? On public property? I can hear the privacy rights types in a crazy uproar already.

Plus it's easy to defeat technology.

Having an actual person there would be plenty of deterrent against vandalism and theft.

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 7, 2010 at 9:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

And the guard would be cheaper than cameras and motion sensors.

Posted by Shamrock (anonymous) on February 15, 2010 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Let's examine how we've come to the point that we need night security guards at the city schools!

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 15, 2010 at 8:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

One fool got away with vandalism and theft and now other's think they can get away with it to. Simple as that.

The school became an easy target. Easily fixed with a simple measure: a security guard.

Posted by outlaw11 (anonymous) on February 23, 2010 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As an 'ole' investigator, we used guards for patrol in many venues (schools, hotels, banks, etc.) and for a time it was effective, but, eventually their path was figured out and plans were made around their nightly rounds...so, electronic means replaced the guards...now, with so many hackers, the electronic equiptment is obsolete...where do we go? There should be some 'harsh' sentences handed for this type of vandalism and carry them out...don't know the answer, but, if a security guard put his hands on a minor who was doing this stuff, then a law-suit would commence...so, let's first pass a law to protect the guard and then put them in place...maybe, maybe not...just my opinion.

Posted by knos (anonymous) on February 23, 2010 at 2:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Street thugs or other Hell's Angels types might be an option. Or some 'good ol' boys' to stay in the area...

Police aren't always the best option. I mean, who would mess with the school if they knew a good beating would come swiftly upon them if they chose to partake in such foolishness?

Those style assaults aren't that big a deal. At most it's a fine or a month in jail.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

© 2010 The Andalusia Star News All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy